Ed Hall (Buxley) wrote: >never posted on sci.geo.satellite-nav because I >considered geocaching off-topic for that newsgroup. >I suppose we could take our discussions over to >that venue for a while to show them how much >traffic there is... *wink*
That might really be the only way to prove that the volume exists.
Scout wrote: >alt.satellite.gps is, well, an "alt" newsgroup.
If a consensus starts to emerge about a name, we could always start an alt. group to show the traffic is there (alt.rec.outdoors.geocaching for example) and then try to get it into the _real_ hierarchy. Much easier to start with.