RE: [gpsstash] Re: Do we want a usenet group? (RFD)
> Eric O'Connor (firstname.lastname@example.org) writes: > Does anyone have a problem with.... > > alt.rec.seek > > This would initially be shared with similar hobbies until a sub-group > can reasonably be justified. > > Later we could add groups like: > > alt.rec.seek.cache > alt.rec.seek.confluence > alt.rec.seek.letterbox
I like your arguments for "seek" but, if I was looking for a Geocaching group on Usenet, I'd never think to look for 'alt.rec.seek'.
If we're just looking for a group name for geocaching, I'd recommend 'alt.rec.geocaching'; you can't get more clear than that.
If we want to expand the group's charter to include all gps-based games (e.g. confluence hunting, geodashing, etc.) I'd recommend 'alt.rec.gps'. Unfortunately, this leaves out the letterboxers, but they could always create 'alt.rec.letterboxing' if they wanted...
In any case, thanks for taking the lead on this Eric!
-- Ed Hall (email@example.com) http://www.brillig.com/ "There's a hell of a universe next door: let's go!" - e. e. cummings