I upload 500 caches into my Garmin Etrex Vista Cx, as well as my Palm Zire 71 in about 2 to 3 minutes TOTAL. 'Nuff said?
--- In email@example.com, "Charles" wrote: > > > I have an Explorist 200 that you can't do anything but manually > enter coordinates for caches into. It takes me about thirty seconds > to a minute to enter them and name them something to keep up with > what's what. Is that too time consuming for most people? Are the gps > units that you can do the download stuff that much faster? Can you > pump a bunch of geocache coords in in a second or two or what's the > deal? I'm happy, but would I be a lot happier with download > capability? Sell me on it, I'm willing to listen... > > Ramapirate > > > > > > > > --- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "Neil R. Ormos" > wrote: > > > > Andy Mabbett wrote: > > > > > Those of you who publish waypoints on websites > > > may be interested in the 'Geo' microformat: > > > > > Intro: > 29> > > > > > Spec, etc: > > > > > which is for marking-up waypoints in (X)HTML, so > > > that they can easily be looked up on maps, > > > downloaded into GPS units, or processed in some > > > other way. > > > > > I'm happy to answer any questions, or to help > > > webmasters begin using them. > > > > Great! Yet another unnecessary, overcomplicated, > > incompatible format for representing geographic > > coordinates. But I guess when your only tool is a > > Howitzer, you use it, even when you just need to > > drive a nail. > > >